Rossi's new memoir revisits 2015 rivalry and his claim Marquez wanted him to lose
Valentino Rossi's new autobiography revisits his 2015 title fight, where he argues Marc Marquez interfered in his battle with Jorge Lorenzo.
According to Motorsport.com, Valentino Rossi has returned to his 2015 feud with Marc Marquez in a new autobiography, titled La Mia Storia. The nine-time world champion maintains in the book that Marquez interfered in his MotoGP title battle with Jorge Lorenzo that year.
The outlet reports that the book is a follow-up to an earlier memoir Rossi published while he was still at the height of his racing career. The new work was scheduled for release on November 10, and Motorsport.com describes it as offering a fresh account of the episode.
The coverage centers on Rossi's version of events. Motorsport.com's report presents his claim about Marquez as the author's own position rather than an established finding.
No response from Marquez is included in the report.
Background
Valentino Rossi became one of the most recognizable names in motorcycle racing during a career that spanned several decades in the premier class. He won world titles across different eras and grew into a global figure well beyond the paddock, helped by a large fanbase and a flair for showmanship. Rivalries were a defining part of that image.
The 2015 season took place while Rossi was riding for Yamaha alongside Lorenzo, a teammate who had also been a champion. Teammate battles in MotoGP can be especially intense, since riders share engineers and machinery while competing for the same title. Marquez, riding for Honda, was emerging as a dominant force, and the tensions between riders and manufacturers became a central storyline that year.
Memoirs by top athletes often return to pivotal seasons, partly to set the record straight and partly because the meaning of a career shifts with time. Sports autobiographies can offer insider perspective, but they are also shaped by memory and by the years between the event and the telling. Readers tend to weigh these accounts alongside race results, contemporary interviews, and the views of others involved.
Motorsport has a long tradition of rivalries becoming the stories that define careers. For fans, the question is less about settling one dispute than about how competitors remember shared moments. That is why new accounts of old rivalries keep drawing attention long after the checkered flag.
Why it matters
Rivalry narratives shape how a rider's legacy is remembered. When a champion revisits a contested season, the account can influence how fans, journalists, and historians interpret results that were already recorded. A title is a fixed outcome, but the story around it remains open to retelling.
The episode also highlights how sport handles competing memories. Rossi's account is one perspective, and the sport's public record rests on race data, team decisions, and reporting from the time. Readers can take a personal account seriously while recognizing that it reflects one participant's experience.
For MotoGP, the renewed attention is a reminder that the sport's rivalries still carry emotional weight years later. Riders, teams, and fans continue to invest in these storylines, and a high-profile book can bring old tensions back into the conversation. That matters for how the current generation of riders understands the history they are part of.
Finally, the story underlines the value of careful reading. A memoir can be engaging and revealing without being the final word. Fans who want the full picture will look at multiple sources and keep the distinction between recollection and documented fact in view.
What to watch
The most immediate question is whether Marquez or others connected to the 2015 season respond publicly to the new claims. Any reply, or the absence of one, will shape how the discussion develops.
Watch also for further excerpts, interviews, or media appearances connected to the book. Extended coverage could add context, or it could show how the author frames the episode in more detail.
Pay attention to how fans and former team figures discuss the 2015 season in the weeks ahead. Their reactions will indicate whether the book revives the rivalry or becomes one more chapter in a well-known history.
Viewpoints
Commentary from our columns: three angles on this story.
The Paddock the racing angle
Every rivalry in this sport eventually gets written twice: once on the track, and once in the memoirs that follow. Rossi's return to 2015 is a reminder of how much that season still lives in the paddock. Teammates and rivals share garages, engineers and a single championship, and the pressure on those relationships is intense. That pressure does not disappear when the helmets come off.
What makes this story compelling is less the question of who did what and more how a champion chooses to frame a painful chapter. From the pit wall, riders often speak about rivals with respect, even when the battle was bitter. Rossi's willingness to revisit the episode suggests the wounds are still felt. Fans will want to hear the other side in future interviews, and that is a healthy part of how the sport remembers itself.
The Long View history and context
Motorsport memoirs have always been a little like race reports written after the dust settles. Each generation of champions returns to the defining seasons, and each return reshapes how those seasons are understood. Rossi's latest book adds another layer to a rivalry that has already been discussed for a decade.
History tends to soften the sharp edges of old disputes, but it also preserves them. The 2015 season will be remembered through race results, team statements, and the memories of those who lived it. A new autobiography becomes part of that archive, and future writers will weigh it alongside everything else. The most useful response for readers is to keep the story in context: a rider's account is valuable, but the longer view is built from many sources, not one voice.
The Skeptic open questions and weak points
A memoir is a persuasive document, and that deserves respect and scrutiny in equal measure. Rossi has every reason to tell a story in which his 2015 season was shaped by forces beyond his control. That does not make the account false, but it does mean readers should ask what evidence sits behind the claim and which details the author chooses to foreground.
The open questions are straightforward. What specific moments does the book describe, and how do they compare with contemporary reporting? Has the other party had a chance to respond, and how is that response presented? Fans should resist treating either side as settled before they have seen the reasoning laid out in full. The most honest reading of a rivalry memoir keeps the author's perspective separate from the documented record, and that discipline matters even more when the story is emotionally charged.